![]() The environment is not equal and men are the privileged party in this case. ![]() You see we cannot judge as if the environment was already equal and so act as if we’re simply trying to maintain this equality. This changes the environment and thus the ethical considerations we have, with which to decide if the label of discrimination can be assigned. You see, we do not live in a gender equal society and many many sports and hobbies are male-dominated without particular logical reason (ie unlike some physical sports where the male physical build gives a distinct advantage) but rather as a historical continuity. Why? Because of privilege and existing domination. ![]() You’re not justified in rooting for a male crashing the women’s tournament. The short answer is no, it’s not discrimination when women do it. This is actually an argument that makes sense, unlike the rest of the misogynistic strawmen, and thus deserves a more detailed counter. And if you would root for a female taking part into a male-only tournament and winning, so we are justified in rooting for a the guy in this case. ![]() Therefore the guy did nothing wrong to use anti-discriminatory laws in order to take part. If it is discrimination to setup male-only poker tournaments, then it follows that it must be discrimination to setup female-only poker tournaments. In my recent encounter with sexism, one argument was often put forth by the males of Reddit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |